GENDER JUSTICE OR DISPARITY? THE RIPPLE EFFECTS OF WOMEN-FOCUSED LAWS ON MEN

GENDER JUSTICE OR DISPARITY? THE RIPPLE EFFECTS OF WOMEN-FOCUSED LAWS ON MEN

GENDER JUSTICE OR DISPARITY? THE RIPPLE EFFECTS OF WOMEN-FOCUSED LAWS ON MEN

AUTHOR – DIVYA TRIPATHI, STUDENT AT SHRI RAMSWAROOP MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW

BEST CITATION – DIVYA TRIPATHI, GENDER JUSTICE OR DISPARITY? THE RIPPLE EFFECTS OF WOMEN-FOCUSED LAWS ON MEN, ILE MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 3 (1) OF 2024, PG. 293-302, APIS – 3920-0007 | ISSN – 2583-7230.

ABSTRACT

In our democratic nation, we are governed by the Constitution of India, which stands as the most comprehensive written constitution in the world. The Constitution’s provisions guarantee equality before the law for all individuals, irrespective of their citizenship, gender, wealth, social standing, or legal status. Nevertheless, despite this foundational principle of equality, societal norms often favor men over women, resulting in a notable imbalance in social status. In contemporary society, there are instances where women infringe upon men’s rights, driven by their ego. It is regrettable that some women recognize their misconduct yet continue to engage in harassment and violations against men, allowing their ego to take precedence. In this context, men emerge as the primary victims. They are compelled to navigate legal proceedings for actions they have neither committed nor would be expected to commit. During the legal process, men endure defamation until a favorable judgment is reached. They are required to dedicate significant time to preparing their defense, collecting evidence, locating witnesses, and even sacrificing their employment. The fundamental right to life and liberty of man is being violated before the court itself, as they are forcibly involved in a fictitious case.[1]

Keywords: constitution, equality, gender, social status, judgment, liberty, court, defamation, right to life and liberty.


[1] Gender, Constitution and the Courts  in Engendering Law, S.P. Satlie