JUDICIAL REVIEW: A SYSTEMATIZED TOOL FOR GOVERNING NATION IN COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS WITH USA & UK
AUTHOR – T. JAYAVARTHINI, STUDENT AT SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW, TAMILNADU DR. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY.
BEST CITATION – T. JAYAVARTHINI, JUDICIAL REVIEW: A SYSTEMATIZED TOOL FOR GOVERNING NATION IN COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS WITH USA & UK, ILE MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 3 (1) OF 2024, PG. 167-177, APIS – 3920-0007 | ISSN – 2583-7230.
ABSTRACT
This study compares judicial review in the United States, United Kingdom, and India, and looks at it as a formalized mode of operation for states. The system of judicial review, one of the most vital aspects of constitutional government, allows the courts to examine the constitutionality of legislative enactments, executive orders, and administrative regulations to preserve the Constitution’s supremacy and the rights of individuals. This paper will compare and contrast the judicial review systems in these three jurisdictions, with the intent of finding the strengths, weaknesses and limitations in the execution of this power. This project attempts to add to the continuing dialogue on the judiciary’s part in upholding constitutionalism, the rule of law, and democratic government by examining the subtleties of judicial review in the USA, UK, and India.
Keywords: Judicial Review, Constitutional Governance, Comparative Constitutional Law, USA, UK, INDIA.